DR. ISABELLA MITTERBÖCK
head of travel agency and info office Admont
Communication scientist/ethnologist, tourism specialist
+43 3613 2116060
+43 664 3465629
i.mitterboeck@nationalpark-gesaeuse.at
Are you planning a school or group trip to the Gesäuse National Park? Simply send us an enquiry or give us a call. We will be happy to help you!
head of travel agency and info office Admont
Communication scientist/ethnologist, tourism specialist
+43 3613 2116060
+43 664 3465629
i.mitterboeck@nationalpark-gesaeuse.at
Wir, Nationalpark Gesäuse GmbH (Firmensitz: Österreich), würden gerne mit externen Diensten personenbezogene Daten verarbeiten. Diese ist für die Nutzung der Website nicht notwendig, ermöglicht uns aber eine noch engere Interaktion mit Ihnen. Falls gewünscht, treffen Sie bitte eine Auswahl:
Google Analytics
Google LLC, USA
Purpose: Error analysis, statistical evaluation of our website
Processing operations:
Collection of connection data, data from your web browser and data about the content accessed;
execution of analysis software and storage of data on your end device, anonymisation of the
anonymisation of the collected data; evaluation of the anonymous data in the form of statistics.
statistics
Storage period: data on their end device for up to two years.
Joint
Responsible:
Google LLC, Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
Legal basis for
the data processing: Voluntary consent that can be revoked at any time
Consequences
of non-consent: No direct effect on the function of the website;
but limited possibilities for further development and error analysis
Legal basis
for the transfer of data to the USA: The legal basis for the transfer of data
to the USA is
Your
Consent
in accordance with Art. 49 Para. 1 lit a in conjunction with Art. 6 Para. 1 lit a DSGVO. The USA does not have a data protection
EU data protection standards. In particular, US secret services can access your data
without you being informed and without you being able to take legal action against this.
legal action. For this reason, the ECJ has ruled that the previous adequacy decision is invalid.
invalid.